THE TEN BASIC TRUTHS OF CHRISTIANITY

By Dr. Mike Halsey, Pastor
County Line Church

TABLE OF CONTENTS  

INTRODUCTION  

THE PASTOR

  1. THE DEITY AND HUMANITY OF CHRIST

  2. THE INSPIRATION OF SCRIPTURE

  3. SUBSTITUTIONARY ATONEMENT

  4. THE RESURRECTION

  5. THE REALITY OF SATAN

  6. FAITH ALONE IN CHRIST ALONE

  7. A HOLY LIFE

  8. THE UNITY OF THE BODY

  9. THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST

  10. THE TRINITY

INTRODUCTION

What you’re going to be reading is theology, a healthy, robust theology.  This presupposes that we can understand it (Ps. 119:105).  What settles the matter is that Jesus Himself said that truth not only exists, but also can be known.  Listen in on His conversation in John 4:22 and read what He said in John 8:32.  In Luke 9:27; 12:44; and 21:3, we see the same emphasis, as Jesus says, “I tell you the truth…”  In John 14:6, He says, “I am the way, the truth and the life…”

In the consistency that is the Bible, Paul agrees.  In Romans 1:18-20, he points out that we can know the truth, and that if we don’t know, it’s a willing ignorance, like the teenager on a date who knows he’s passed his curfew, but refuses to look at his watch.

The Bible collides with the idea that there is no ultimate truth and that it can’t be known.

Theology isn’t some specialized study for cloistered academics; in fact, in one sense, you are a theologian. Theology is thinking about God and expressing those thoughts.

You’ll find a study of theology expands your mind.  It takes all the intellect you’ve got, and more.  Yet, theology refuses to stay locked in our minds.  It affects our lives.  For example, take the subject of responsibility.  If you have a family, you’re responsible to that family.  Since we live in a society, we’re responsible for paying taxes and obeying the traffic laws.  We work under supervisors to whom we’re responsible for the use of those precious eight or more hours.  Do we have a responsibility to God?

There is what we might call a theology of responsibility. Once we recognize such a theology, this takes the subject out of the abstract and makes us think of our right-now accountability, as well as our yet-to-be accountability to God in one way or another.  (I Cor. 3 for believers of the church age, and Rev. 20 for unbelievers of all the ages.)

Theology has fallen on hard times, almost to the point of extinction.  Sermons and Sunday school lessons entertain with their pop psychology

and “Steps to Success” or with its “Five Ways to Gain Self-Esteem”, and simplistic views of life so as to become ludicrous.

Paul writes that we’re to take heed to theology (I Tim. 1:3; 4:6, II Tim. 3:10, 16; 4:2-3).  Few read theology; fewer preach it.  Jesus tells us, “Man does not live by bread alone, but on every word that proceeds from the mouth of God”.  (Matt. 4:4.)

There’s no substitute for theology and for knowing it.  Since we believe that God has spoken, the most important thing in the world is to learn what He’s said.  The study of theology unfolds God, who He is, what He has said and done; it reveals to us what He’s doing now and what He will say and do in the future.

A sound theology is important because it keeps us from error.  Satan has his counterfeit theology (I Tim. 4:1, 7).  Without a healthy theology, the winds of false teaching will throw us into chaos (Eph. 4:14).

No wonder Paul says theology is important.  It’s so important, he tells us to “hold on” to the theology he’s passed on.  Sometimes it may be hard to understand (II Peter 3:15) and it can be a challenge, but it does its practical work.  (The words “impractical” and “theology” don’t belong in the same sentence.)  Theology invades life to the extent that it rebukes, corrects and trains us for every good work (II Tim. 3:16).  We should retire the old saying, “He’s so heavenly minded, he’s of no earthly good,” because Colossians 3:1-2 says we can’t be heavenly minded enough.

Failure to know God is a horrible thing (Is 1:3).  When an emphasis on theology subsides, we’re in a dangerous position.  What you believe is important.  Jesus presented the truth to Martha and then pointedly asked her, “Do you believe this?” (John 11:25-26).

It’s our desire at County Line Church that you believe Jesus for forgiveness of sin, and for eternal life (Jn. 6:40).  It’s also our desire that you come to understand the healthy and liberating theology of grace (Jn. 8:32).

Most expect theology to be so dull it’s to be avoided at all costs.  But since theology deals with life and death issues, how can it be dull?  If it comes across as dull, dry and boring in this booklet, then that’s my fault, because it’s not.  (The account on pages 17-18 is a case in point about how interesting theology can be.  The story is by Dr. Charles Ryrie and is from his book, So Great Salvation.)  

So, this is a look at the ten basic truths of Christianity, truths I hope to present in a way that excites your interest in, your investigation of, and your fascination with Christ and His Word.

THE PASTOR  

Although it’s not one of the ten basic truths of Christianity, any believer wanting to join County Line Church should be aware of the biblical responsibilities God has given the pastor of a local church.  Perhaps no other aspect of the church has been so encrusted with tradition as the office of pastor.  As with everything else at County Line Church, we chisel the duties of the pastor out of the quarry of biblical marble, not from the historical swamps of the traditions of men.

The historical swamps of tradition vary from region to region.  In another era across the Atlantic, tradition dictated that the pastor was to ride a bicycle higher than those of others. In some areas, he was to dress differently and when he had something important to say, he had to stand in a specific place behind a certain article of church furniture and speak in a different tone of voice.

Yet, the Bible is clear on the calling of a pastor.  God calls him and gifts him to be an “equipper.”  It’s a calling, not a “job;” the pastor is not a “professional.”  The biblical pastor would be the first to tell you that his calling is based on God’s sovereign grace-gift of pastor-teacher, the gift mentioned in Ephesians 4.

Ephesians 4:11-12 puts the spotlight on the gifts God has given to men and the men He’s given to the church.  In the Greek language, “pastors and teachers” (Vs. 11) is one gift, “pastor-teacher,” so that the pastor is a teacher with a God-directed purpose.

God is specific in Ephesians 4:12:  the pastor’s calling is to equip believers to do the works of service so that the body of Christ might be built up.  The biblical pastor (there shouldn’t be any other kind!) is an equipper, a cultivator of believers who brings a person to be the servant God designed him (or her) to be.  The cultivator moves people from being ineffective to be-coming effective servants of the Lord who build up the body of Christ.  In summary, the pastor helps you to become all God designed for you to become.

At times, the cultivation will be formal and planned (sermons); at other times, it’s informal and incidental (in conversations, in one-on-one discussions, in small discipleship groups, in hospital rooms).  In the formal equipping, the pastor-teacher teaches the Word of God and what it means in your daily living.  He’s not a lecturer on antiquities, but he deals with the Bible and our lives now.  

The Bible summarizes the cultivation work of the pastor with the command to “make disciples” (Matt. 28).  The cultivator reproduces reproducers.  He leads God’s flock by equipping them for the work of service through teach-ing them to know and live God’s truth in such a way that they become disciplemakers.

We can also capture the role of the pastor-teacher with a modern equivalent, what we call a “player coach,” one who teaches the believers to play their positions in the field, and then he turns them loose to let them play.

Ephesians 4:11-12 drains the historical swamps of the traditional, man-assigned roles of the pastor.  Ephesians 4 won’t allow the pastor to keep his hands on the reigns and do it all.  These verses won’t allow the pastor to use people to feed programs to get things done.  He is a cultivator, not a user.  The cultivator equips believers who then begin to do what God has designed them to do in line with their gift.

God has written the description of the calling:  “Equip believers to do the work of the ministry.”  No pastor has a right to write the description, one which would suit his preferences of performance.  Pastors aren’t God’s editors; they are God-called and God-gifted cultivators given to the church.  It’s a grace-gifting, neither earned nor deserved by its recipient.

Certainly there are many things in a local church that need doing.  The beauty of the body is that God gifts believers with all kinds of gifts (I Cor. 12, Rom. 12, and Eph. 4) who, once equipped, mesh those gifts of administration, teaching, helps, encouraging, et. al. into a vital and functioning organism that has impact.

In the early church, one of the things that needed doing was the administration of neglected widows.  In Acts 6, there was the potential of diverting the apostles (the first cultivators) from their role of making disciples and channeling their energies into administrative/delivery duties.

The apostles saw the danger and alerted the church to it.  The church then chose others to enroll the widows, keep the lists, administrate, and deliver the meals on chariot wheels.  This allowed the cultivators to devote themselves to their God-assigned role, saying, “We’ll devote ourselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word.”

Cultivator. Player-coach. Disciplemaker.  The three words all say the same thing and are terms that sculpt the biblical marble into the doctrine of the biblical pastor.  

“THE DIETY AND HUMANITY OF CHRIST”

The librarian of the Library of Congress said that there are more books written on Jesus Christ than any other subject or person in the world.  He said that the Civil War ranks second, but that Jesus is first.  Why?

Two thousand years after He was last on the earth, millions and millions of men, women and children meet every seven days to talk about Him.  These millions speak different languages, dress in different ways, listen to different music and eat food of their regions.  They gather on every inhabitable continent to examine what Jesus had to say and to study what He did.  Why?

Men and women meet in seminaries and Bible colleges in such places as America, England, Europe, India, Romania, South and Central America, as well as Australia and Canada.  In the past, people established universities such as Harvard and Yale to pore over what Jesus said and did, and commissioned their students to take His message wherever they went.  Scholars devote their lives to pore over the tenses of the verbs He spoke and the cases of the nouns He used.

How many millions and millions of people gather consistently every seven days to pore over Socrates, Plato or Aristotle?  Do any in India or Japan?  Those titans of Roman history who lived contemporaneously with Jesus—any study groups which devote their time to Emperor Tiberius?  No, obviously not.  Are there Pontius Pilate Study Guilds?

The question is WHY is so much time devoted by so many to this Person who was publicly known for only three short years?

We find the answer in Phil. 2:5-11.  This one chapter in Philippians is the most discussed and written about of all of its four.  It is this chapter that has caused church councils in the fourth century, as well as in the Reformation.

It is Phil. 2 that tells us why they’ve written and are writing so many books and held so many meetings; why they go over His words with so much meticulous study.

Philippians 2:5-11

As is the way of the Bible, the author crams a cargo load of doctrine in a few sentences.  He begins by writing about Jesus, “who, being in the very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped” (2:6).  With one word, “being,” Paul states that Jesus pre-existed before He came into the world and that in His pre-existence He was in His “very nature God.”  The nature that Jesus possessed was deity; that is, He possessed the entire nature and essence of God.

Whatever characteristics God has, Jesus has.  Since God is omniscience, so is Jesus; since God is absolute righteousness, so is Jesus.  Some have summarized it:  Jesus is just as much God as God is God.  Other references: John 1:1-14; 20:28.

As Jesus existed eternally in eternity past, the nature He possessed was deity, so He didn’t need to grasp deity, He always had it.

In this doctrinal cargo, Paul writes that there occurred an “emptying.”  In verse 7, we learn that Jesus “made Himself nothing.”  The Greek word (kenoo) means, “emptied.”  Jesus emptied Himself by “taking on the form of a slave.”

Jesus, voluntarily and unforced, took a lower position than He had.  In taking the form of a slave, He still retained His deity, yet in taking the form of a slave, He became a human being.  In becoming the “likeness of men,” He became thirsty, hungry and slept.  Being a human being, He knew such limitations by experience, yet He was different in that He was sinless.

Had you seen Him, He appeared as a human being—He dressed like a human being; His actions were those of a human being, all apart from sin.

He became a man without ceasing to be God, so that He could die.  He had to empty Himself of His position because a man can die, whereas God cannot.  He added humanity, yet with deity undiminished.

He neither gave up His deity or the characteristics of deity when He was born into the human race.  All of this is so He could die.

We call this the Doctrine of Kenosis (ken-o-sis), from the Greek word, “to empty.”  We can define the doctrine as “Christ’s leaving His pre-existent position and taking on a servant humanity with deity undiminished.”  In view of this, we can say that Jesus Christ is true humanity and undiminished deity united in one Person forever.”

So this is the reason for all the books, the study and all the meetings, because Jesus is the unique Person of the universe.  There is no one who is as He is.

So?  Paul won’t let us make an abstraction out of this doctrine and leave it lying dry and dusty in a notebook.  In Phil. 2:5, as he introduces this doctrine, he says, “Your attitude should be the same as Jesus’.”  At County Line Church, we want to serve to build you up in the faith, to bring you to a growing confidence in God and to help you become a success in God’s sight.

THE INSPIRATION OF THE SCRIPTURE  

INTRODUCTION  

The problem is, what do we mean by the word, “inspiration?”  Because of this, it’s important to be as precise as we can.  “I believe in the inspiration of the Bible”.  This is a statement that’s too vague in view of the different ideas about the meaning of the word.

Our ultimate reference point for understanding inspiration is the Bible itself, that is, what it says about itself.  Here’s the Bible’s testimony about itself.

1.      II Tim. 3:16—in this verse, the Bible makes three statements about itself.

          A.  The entire Bible is inspired and profitable.  This speaks as to the extent of inspiration.  It’s not that some parts are inspired and others aren’t.  The word “Scripture” in the Bible refers to the Old Testament and sometimes to parts of the New Testament.  (Luke 24:45; John 10:35; Luke 4:21; I Tim. 5:18 and II Peter 3:16)

          B.  The entire Bible is God-breathed.  This speaks of?  Of inspiration. The Bible is the result of God’s breath.  God breathed out the Scripture.

          C.  The entire Bible is profitable.  This tells us the purpose of inspiration.  Its purpose is to correct, restore and train; therefore, we don’t put the Bible in a glass case to be admired.

2.      In II Peter 1:21, we find the one verse in Scripture that tells us more than any other about how God produced the Bible.  The Holy Spirit moved the authors along.  The word for “moved” is a word for how the wind takes control of a ship and directs it. The human authors played their part, but their wills didn’t direct the writing of the Bible.

          The “prophecy” was not by the will of man, that is, human initiative didn’t produce the Bible.  God is the source of the Bible.

3.      I Cor. 2:13 points out that the Bible came to us in words.  The actual words of the Bible are inspired.  

So, what is “inspiration”?  God carried men along so that what they wrote was what God wanted them to write in the Bible.  That is, God superintended the human authors of the Bible so that they composed and recorded without error His message to man in the words of their original writings.

"Superintended” means God was guiding the writers so they wrote accurately.  “Composed” means they weren’t stenographers.  “Without error” points to John 17:17.  And remember, inspiration applies and can be said only of the original writings, not copies or translations.

CONCLUSION

There’s no other book like the Bible.  God breathed it, men wrote it and we possess it.

SUBSTITUTIONARY ATONEMENT  

INTRODUCTION  

Outside the walls of Jerusalem 2000 years ago, passersby saw three men hanging on three crosses.  What they were seeing was one of the three most important events in world history (the Death of Christ, the Resurrection of Christ and the Second Coming of Christ.)  What they were seeing was an event that would be recorded, explained and remembered forever.

What they were seeing was an event that had cast its shadows long before it occurred because what they were seeing was the complete, total and finished solution to the problem of man’s sin and sinful state.  They were seeing world history changed before their eyes, a unique event, something that had never happened before, something that would never happen again.

The death of Christ on the cross is an event that God explains to us because without His explanation, we wouldn’t know what was happening at the time.  God explains it in only one place—the Bible.  The way He explains it is by means of a system and two prepositions.

Explanation by Means of a System

By means of a system as old as Genesis 3, God inaugurated a sacrificial system for fallen man, a system that was a picture of the One to come, a picture of the way to get back to God.  Under the sacrificial system, later codified in the Mosaic Law at Mt. Sinai, the sacrificer would bring the animal to the altar, lay his hands on the animal about to be sacrificed and then the animal was put to death.  The sacrificer understood that the animal was taking his place, functioning as his representative because he had identified with the animal by placing his hands on it.

Explanation by Means of Two Prepositions

When the authors of Scripture wrote the preposition “anti”, they were using a word which meant “face-to-face”, “opposite” as two objects placed over against each other and one of those objects being taken instead of the other one.  It meant “an exchange”.  It means “instead of”.  We see this in Matt. 2:22 and Luke 11:11.  Other Scriptures show the idea of exchange in John 1:16, Rom. 12:17, I Thess. 5:15, Heb. 12:16 and I Peter 3:9.  The most important verse which uses “anti” is Mark 10:45, which also gives us Jesus’ interpretation of His coming death.  His words settle the matter.

The other preposition God uses in the Bible to explain Christ’s death is the preposition “huper”.  The original idea of this word meant to stand in the place of someone to protect him and receive the blows on his behalf.  Romans 9:3 and Philemon 13 show us this use.  In Philemon 13, Onesimus was a newly converted slave and about to return to his master, Philemon, in Colosse.  Paul wants to keep Onesimus with him to help him on Onesimus’ behalf.  This can only mean that someone has to be in Rome with Paul—either Philemon or his slave, Onesimus, as his substitute.

Other Scriptures in this regard are John 11:50-51, Rom. 5:6-8, II Cor. 5:21, Gal. 3:13, Titus 2:14 and I Peter 3:18.

CONCLUSION

Christ suffered as a substitute for us; that is, Christ suffered instead of us, resulting in the advantage to us of paying for our sins.  This substitution was voluntary on His part (“No one takes My life from Me; I lay it down and I take it up again.”) and it provides an eternal satisfaction, once for all, never to be repeated.

THE RESURRECTION  

INTRODUCTION  

The Bible brings a message of life and death.  Camus once said, “Death is philosophy’s only problem.”  Freud wrote, “Every person owes nature his own death and [he] must be prepared to pay this debt.  It is natural, undeniable, and unavoidable.”  Freud also wrote that we tend to push death aside.  He pointed out that the human being can’t imagine his own death because when he tries to imagine it, he always sees himself as surviving as a spectator.  Therefore, he wrote, “Nobody believes in his own death.”

When someone dies, we act in a special way—we suspend criticism and we forgive the person any wrong as the Latin motto swings into action (demortuis nil nisi bene), “About the dead, nothing unless good.”  (Timely Thoughts on Death)

It’s interesting that at every wedding we attend, the pastor always says, “If anyone knows any reason why these two should not be joined together in holy matrimony, let him speak now or forever hold his peace.”  One author has said that it would be a shock if such a statement were asked at a funeral service.  What would the shock be like if the minister described the deceased and then asked, “If anyone disagrees with the description I’ve given of the deceased or challenges what I’ve said about the destiny to which we’ve committed our trust….”  What if someone raised his hand in disagreement!

The Bible brings a message of life and death.  Christ predicted that He would die and rise from the dead.  This was the most controversial of all His statements.  He told both His followers and His enemies to expect it.  His enemies put a guard at the tomb to prevent it and His followers didn’t take Him literally.

The New Testament doesn’t present a spiritual resurrection, which would have been easy to do.  People do this all the time.  No, the disciples preached a physical resurrection.

So much hinges on the resurrection of Jesus Christ that it’s impossible to overstate the importance of this foundational doctrine of Christianity.  To state it another way, if they find the body of Jesus in Jerusalem, then it’s all over.  If such a discovery were made, there would be no “Christianity”.  Christianity falls apart without it.  Just how important is the resurrection?

If Jesus did not rise from the dead:

  1. There is no gospel. In 1 Cor. 15:3-8, Paul points out that the gospel is based on the fact that Christ died and is alive.

  2. Jesus lied. He predicted His own death (which did not surprise Him), then he said that He would rise from the dead (Matt. 20:19) and in John 2, He predicts it as well, but not in so obvious a statement. The resurrection authenticated Jesus.

  3. Our faith is meaningless.  Paul calls  Christians a  group most to be  pitied  if Jesus did  not  rise from  the  dead.  If there’s no resurrection, then we can add hopelessness to our being without meaning.

How do we know that Christ rose from the dead?

          1.  The Bible says that He did.                  

                   a)  This explains why individuals, groups and large numbers of people saw Him alive after His death.
                       
(cf. I Cor. 15)               

                   b)  This is why both the Romans and the followers of Jesus agreed that His tomb was empty.

                   c)  This is why the day of Pentecost brought the Holy Spirit to indwell believers.

                   d)  This explains why the day of worship suddenly changed from Saturday (the Sabbath) to Sunday
                        because it was to commemorate the resurrection.

The resurrection introduced a new person.

  1. A new kind of body appeared in the universe.  Jesus was raised in a body which would never die; still recognizable by those who had known Him, yet retaining the scars from the cross.  In this body, Jesus could enter rooms without using doors, appearing and disappearing at will.

  2. The resurrection introduced a new prototype.  (Col. 1:8 and Rev. 1:5)  The resurrection bodies of believers will be like Christ's body.  (I Cor. 15:35-41 and I John 3:2)  To be like Jesus will be to be pure, without sin, and righteous.

  3. The resurrection proved Jesus to be right.  (Rom 1:4)

Why is Christ’s resurrection important?

If He didn’t rise from the dead, then He is a liar or was deceived.  He said He would rise from the dead in Matt. 20:19.

If He didn’t rise from the dead, then His work on the cross wasn’t good enough.  Without the resurrection, there is no gospel. (I Cor. 15:1-5)  Without the resurrection, He cannot be the Son of God as the Bible claims. (Rom. 1:4)

Without the resurrection, there are no present ministries of Christ, such as His high priestly work, advocate (I John), and the Head of the church.

If the resurrection didn’t occur, then we Christians are to be objects of pity.  (I Cor. 15)

The most detailed revelation of the resurrected Christ is found in Revelation 1:12-16, which is how we’ll see Him one day.

What have been the effects of the resurrection?

The resurrection of Christ caused His followers’ enemies to admit His tomb was empty (Matt. 28:11-15).  It caused the events of the day of Pentecost (Acts 2).  It caused the coming of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1).  It caused the birth of the church (Acts 2) and the revolutionary change of days of worship from Saturday (the Sabbath) to Sunday (Acts 20:7).

CONCLUSION

The resurrection is one of the most crucial doctrines of Christianity, so crucial that if they discovered Christ’s body tomorrow, we would stop meeting.  Without the resurrection, there is no Christianity.

THE REALITY OF SATAN

Philosophers, theologians, plumbers, lawyers, bankers and mechanics have thought about the problem of evil and where it comes from.  Is evil intrinsic to the universe?  Has there always been evil?  The Bible doesn’t think about the answer.  It reveals it.

In contrast to other statements about the origin of evil, the Bible says that the origin of evil lies in a person.  Not an influence.  Not a force.  A person.  The Bible presents Satan as a being with personality.

Literature and other arts have treated the devil in an interesting manner.  Some may remember the short story, “The Devil and Daniel Webster,” from their high school days.  Satan has been portrayed as a lawyer and again as female, while a comedian made a living from the phrase, “The devil made me do it.”

The moment you accept the Bible as revelation from God and not man’s thoughts about God, you then accept the reality of Satan.  What makes the case is only one sentence—Jesus said Satan is a person and Jesus affirmed his existence.

A person, to be a person, has three things:  intellect, emotions and a will.  The Bible says that Satan has all three (II Cor. 11:3; Rev. 12:17; Is. 14:12-14; II Tim. 2:26).

The Book of Job refers to Satan using the personal pronoun “he”, as does Matthew 4.  In Matthew 25:41 God holds Satan accountable, which further demonstrates that the Bible presents him as a person.  You can’t hold an idea or a force accountable for punishment.

Just as every person has a history, so does Satan.  He is a created being (therefore, he has not always existed, nor does he possess the characteristics God does).  Of all the verses in the Bible, only one tells us the origin of sin—Ezekiel 28:15.  God created Satan perfect, but he sinned and fell from his high angelic rank.  I Timothy 3:6 tells us that sin was the sin of arrogance, and we see the details of his pride in Isaiah 14:12-14 in the infamous “Five I Wills.”

Satan becomes a premier illustration of just how sin ripples out to others.  His sin caused repercussions among angels (Rev. 12:7), among all members of the human race (Eph. 2:2) and among all the nations. (Rev. 20:3).

Just as every person has a future, so every person has things they do.  What has Satan done and what does he do?

  1. He tried to eliminate the cross.  (Matt. 4:3-10)

  2. He hates and opposes Christ.  (Gen. 3:15; Matt. 2:16; Matt. 16:21-23; Matt. 4:1-11)

  3. He is a counterfeiter who wants to be like God.  (Gen 3:5; II Tim. 3:5; II Cor. 11:15; I Tim. 4:1-3)

  4. He deceives nations.  (Rev. 20:3)  (He can promote the idea among the nations that they can bring peace to the world apart from the rule of Christ; he used governments to hinder the spread of the gospel (I Thess. 2:18).  He’ll deceive the nations into accepting the Anti-Christ (Rev. 13:2-4).

  5. He blinds the minds of men to the gospel.  (II Cor. 4:4)  (He does this through promotion of the idea that “there are many ways to heaven, by snatching away the Word of God that people hear (Luke. 8:12), and through his trump card, religion.)

  6. He tempts believers to immorality (I Cor. 7:5), to conformity to the world system (I Thess. 3:5), and to cover up selfishness (Acts 5).

  7. He opposes believers in witnessing by persecution and he accuses us before God (Rev. 12:10), but Christ defends us.  (I John 2:1-2).

  8. He negates our usefulness and testimony.  (I Peter 5:8)

Just as every person has a history and things he does, so every person has a future.  Martin Luther said, “The devil is God’s devil” and he said it well.  God will judge Satan at the end of the millennial reign of Christ.  The result of that judgment will be that God will cast Satan into the lake of fire for all of eternity. (Matt. 25:41; Rev. 20:10)

Someone said that when you get down to basic questions, there aren’t many people left in the room.  He meant that basic questions have few options for answers.  When we come to the problem and question of evil, there aren’t many options.  One option gives us no hope.  Another option is to say that evil doesn’t exist.  But that idea is ridiculous.  Another is to say that evil does exist, but we’re making progress on its eradication.  There’s no evidence for that either.

There is only one answer—the Bible’s.  The Bible’s answer is that evil was not part of the original creation, that it is an intrusion into the universe, that it came through Satan.  Then, and only then, is there hope.  God can and will hold Satan accountable; He will judge him; He will put down evil.

FAITH ALONE IN CHRIST ALONE

Grace is a difficult concept to understand.  We might say it is impossible to understand.  From our first conscious moment, we live and breathe in a merit system based on our performance.  A merit system says, “Do, and I/we/the company/the school will reward you.  Performance is the basis of business.  Deserve it, and then you’ll get it.  If your performance is beneath stated expectations, then I/we/the company/the school will punish by withholding rewards from you.

If the salesman does above the standards, then there are bonuses, but he earns them.  No one gives them.  If the company does well over the year, then they give you a Christmas bonus, but if it didn’t do well, then there is no bonus.  So, in a sense, you have to earn the bonus.  To live is to plug into a merit system of performance.

We give names to this system.  It is a race, that is, a rat race.  Our office building where we work is a mine, a salt mine.  We compare the system to hungry animals because it’s dog-eat-dog.  Bosses are slave drivers.

Advertising highlights the merit system.  Nike said to us, “Just do it.”  Gold’s Gym said, “No pain, no gain.”  McDonald’s sang, “You deserve a break today.”  They say, “Be the best.”  “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing.”  “Second best isn’t good enough.”  We “try out” for the team or for cheerleading to see if we’re “good enough.”

Enter the gospel.  The gospel deals with forgiveness and eternal life.  Sin bars us from heaven and eternal life.  Christ’s death resolves it.  In I Corinthians 15:1-3, Paul gives the gospel in a few words.

Christ has done something about sin and offers His forgiveness to us.  It’s important that Christ offers something to us; we don’t offer anything to Him.  I can’t offer Him a pledge to do my best, because my best is imperfect.  I can’t offer Him my future years, because they’ll be imperfect.  I can’t offer Him a promise to, for instance, quit smoking because that wouldn’t do anything about my sins.

Christ finished it all.  Nothing left to do.  The gospel is believe (be persuaded) that Christ died for your sins and rose again the third day.  We sum it up in the phrase “Faith alone in Christ alone.”  By this phrase we mean no subtle blending, no adding to the phrase.   A blend makes the gospel into a false gospel.  (Gal. 1)

The blend may sound spiritual and seem natural.  Examples of blends are commands, such as, “Believe in Christ and feel sorry for your sins.”  This blend makes salvation depend on feeling a certain way.  This blend is based on a misunderstanding of the word “repent.”  In English, the word has come to mean, “Feel sorry for something,” but in Greek it means, “Change your mind” (verb) or, “A change of mind” (noun).  It has nothing to do with feeling a certain way. Sorrow for sins may accompany belief, but it is not necessary for salvation.

Is repentance necessary for salvation?  That’s an excellent question, but before we can answer it, we have to know, “What do you mean by ‘repentance?’”  If you mean “feel sorry for sin,” then, no, feeling sorry for sin isn’t necessary for salvation.  But if you mean, “change of mind,” then yes, repentance is necessary for salvation.

When a person is persuaded to trust Christ alone as his savior, a change of mind is always involved.  That person has changed his mind to see himself as a sinner, one who can’t become “good enough” for salvation.  He has changed his mind about who Christ is, now realizing that He’s the God-Man who died for his sins, rose from the dead, and the only one who can give him eternal life.  He has changed his mind to come to “faith alone in Christ alone.”

All blends may sound good, but they change the gospel.  Things, such as, “Believe and make Christ the Lord of your life,” “Believe and walk the aisle,” and “Believe and turn from your sins.”

Is this “easy believism”?  No.  Trusting someone isn’t easy.  We stand in line at a store longer because trusting isn’t easy.  Write a check for even two dollars and you’ll have to produce your driver’s license, complete with picture, number, color of eyes and et cetera.  They’re trying out fingerprinting people in Texas when they buy groceries at the Kroger store, and with that fingerprint, the account is automatically debited.  Whatever--it still indicates that trust isn’t easy.

When we call for a person to trust Christ, we’re calling for more than trusting for a $2 check.  When you trusted Christ, just think of what you did.  You trusted:

1.    Someone you couldn’t see.

2.    Someone you’re never seen.

3.    Someone who has no living witnesses who have seen Him.

4.    Someone whose biography was written only by friends.

5.    Someone detailed in a book that’s under attack.

6.    Someone who says, “I’ll give you eternal life and forgiveness of sins and you don’t work for them.”  

CONCLUSION

Grace is very hard for us to understand.  Grace is unmerited favor.  Grace isn’t cheap; it cost the donor.  Grace is truly good news.  

GRACE IS A DIFFICULT, perhaps impossible, concept to understand.  In seminary days, I had a job working with under- privileged junior high and high school kids at the downtown YMCA.  On what was then the outskirts of the city was a camp we used every Friday night, when weather permitted.  We would load a bus with forty to fifty kids, head for the camp, and enjoy an evening cooking out and playing games.  On special occasions we would sleep there overnight and return Saturday afternoon.  Overnight camping trips were usually rewards given to those who had successfully passed certain requirements in our weekly Bible clubs.  So the kids, who stayed overnight after the others went home, were rather special.

On Friday night, or, more accurately, early on Saturday morning, I awoke, startled by some unexplained noise.  Soon I discovered that a few of my leaders had sneaked out of the dorm, gone down to the lake, launched one of the boats, and were having a great time, far out from shore.  Not only was this against every rule in the book, but it was dangerous.  When the kids knew I knew where they were, they came immediately in to shore.  Like dogs with tails between their legs, they meekly went back to bed, wondering what punishment awaited them in the morning.

For me, sleep was now impossible.  The night before, I had talked to these Christian young people about forgiving one another.  So, as I paced the grounds in those early-morning hours, deliberating their fate, my own words from the night before kept coming back to me, and back to me, and back to me.

“If I don’t give them some punishment,” I argued with myself, “they will never be impressed with the seriousness of what they did.  I have a responsibility to the Y to enforce their rules and punish the violators.”

But the more I debated with myself, talked to the Lord, thought about a number of relevant Bible verses (I discovered again that night that you can prove almost anything with a Bible verse), the more Ephesians 4:32 grew larger and larger in my thinking:  “And be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving each other, just as God in Christ also has forgiven you.”

But Lord, I can’t forgive them; they don’t deserve it.” Neither did I.

“But Lord, I have to enforce the rules”.  I’m glad, Lord, You didn’t.

“But Lord, if I’m too kind, the kids will think I’m weak.”  I never thought You were weak, only loving.

“But Lord, first I’ll make them promise never to do something like this again, and I will forgive them.”  It’s a good thing You didn’t require that of me, or I never would have been forgiven.

“…….just as God forgave me.”  How was that?  No conditions or promises ahead of time.  No works at the time. No remembrance afterward.  “But Lord, You’re God—You can do anything.”

“You’re my child,” He said, “Imitate Me.”

So, with great reluctance and with very little faith, I told the Lord I would.

And then, in the morning, I told the kids.  “You did a terrible thing.  It could have had disastrous consequences for yourselves, your families, for the Y, and for me.  But I forgive you unconditionally and completely.”

“You’re kidding,” they said.  “There’s got to be a catch somewhere.”

“No,” I insisted, “you are fully forgiven.”  And then told them what the Lord had been saying to me that night about His grace, and how I wanted them to have another taste of that grace.

I didn’t even make them do the cleaning up that day.  I did it myself because I didn’t want them to think they could earn even a little bit of that forgiveness.

A HOLY LIFE

INTRODUCTION

When the great English evangelist, George Whitefield (18th century), entered Oxford at age 18, he came across a book by William Law entitled “A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life.”  It was a book, which said, “Life by Rule.”  George Whitefield started organizing his life by rules.

He prayed by rule.  He sang songs by rule.  He fasted by the rule.  He studied the Bible by rule.  There were a few others who were trying to live as he was.  They met together and prayed well into the night.  The other students hated them, calling them “Bible moths,” and “Methodists” because of their methodical devotion.  Another name they called the group was the “Holy Club.”  This was the name the group adopted for itself.  The other students loathed them, even pelting them with rocks when they walked on campus.

Whitefield, because of his shyness didn’t join the Holy Club immediately.  The leader of the club would later become famous.  His name was John Wesley, whose hymn-writing brother, Charles, was also a club member.

Whitefield later joined the group and came to enjoy Wesley’s library, where he ran across a book called “The Life of God in the Soul of Man.”  All this time, Whitefield was trying to find a true and holy life by keeping prayer, fasting, and study rules.

After he read the book, and not understanding its implication at this point, he intensified things.  Where he had fasted for days, it now became weeks.  He felt he had been filled with pride, so he told everybody that he was a member of the Holy Club and a Methodist.  He became sloppy and unkempt.  He then started to deliberately fail classes.

He still couldn’t find peace, so he concluded that he had a demon.  He spent whole days and weeks lying on the ground praying.  He concluded that God was angry with him because he talked too much, so he didn’t talk at all.  That didn’t help.  He came to believe that God was angry with him because he had too much comfort, so he sat for hours in the snow.

This went on until his friends and a teacher came to believe he was crazy.  At this point, he fasted until he couldn’t walk up the stairs to his room.  The doctors sent him to bed for seven weeks.  Still his sins loomed before him.

During this time, he spent two hours a day studying the Greek New Testament.

Then came deliverance, when he realized that Christ did it all and that there was nothing he needed to do.  He was free.  He still fasted, prayed and read the Bible, but now it was not because he had to, but because he wanted to.  Out of a grateful heart, he studied the Bible on his knees.  He said, “What happened was that I had come to realize the necessity of being justified by God’s free grace and being justified in His sight by faith only”  (from “Forgotten Founding Father” by Mansfield).

The idea dies hard because, when we become a Christian, after salvation we have a tendency to revert back to a works-rules system to live a holy life.

What exactly is a holy life?  What does a holy life look like?  How do we live a holy life?

We find a short summary and definition of a holy life in Galatians 2:2-23.  But there seems to be much confusion about how to attain a holy life.  But let’s be sure we understand that a holy life doesn’t mean a perfect life.  We don’t reach perfection in this life, as I John 1:8, 10 and Philippians 3:12 point out.

It’s important to note that the Christian life isn’t lived under the Mosaic Law rules (Gal. 5:18).  The Christian is under a higher ethic than the Mosaic Law.

Nor do we build the Christian life by strenuous self-effort.  The Christian life isn’t a program of self-development and self-improvement.  (Gal. 2:20)

We have to also realize that the Christian life isn’t a religious pose, which involves an unnatural manner of life.  We’ve all heard the prayer in which the prayer user assumes an unnatural “holy tone,” a tone he never uses in normal speech.  We’ve all heard the use of stain-glass language of “thee’s” and “thou’s” by which the one praying assumes the holy pronouns.

We shouldn’t come to see the Christian life as mechanical, as if we push the button of I John 1:9 and out comes familiar forgiveness.  Spirituality doesn’t come by going through a laundry list of religious chores to perform.

Don’t think that this life comes by imitating the experiences of other believers, as good as they may be.  George Mueller, the famous English Christian who ran an orphanage in Bristol, is famous for his credo of never telling anyone, even anyone who asked, what his needs were, nor did he tell anyone what the needs of the orphanage were.  Even if the children had no food for the next day’s dinner, or even the same day’s dinner, Mueller would never let anyone know.  It’s a testimony to God’s faithfulness that every need was supplied, though sometimes at the last minute.  Other dedicated believers opened orphanages according to the Mueller model and they failed.

In view of all that, just how do we live the holy life?  It’s a life of a maturing relationship with God.  It’s consistent with the salvation experience in that it’s lived by faith and dependence (“Walk by means of the Spirit”) on the Holy Spirit.  It’s a life that depends on the empowerment of the Holy Spirit to produce the fruit of the Spirit.  The Holy Spirit produces all of the characteristics instantaneously when we walk by means of the Spirit.

The holy life is produced as we’re in a right relationship experientially with God through His Word and the power of the Holy Spirit.  When the relationship is right, there are no mechanical procedures to follow, no listing of things to do mechanically.  A healthy marriage doesn’t grow out of a husband and wife going over the rules for the day; it grows from being in the right relationship with one another, then the “rules” take care of themselves, but the motivation for doing the “rules” is changed.

The Holy Spirit produces the life through the believer who isn’t conscious of an “alien” presence inside him, as the Holy Spirit works through the dependant believer’s will, emotions and intellect.  The believer is only conscious of himself.

The result of this filling of the Holy Spirit (which comes by confession of known sin and faith toward God) are:

  1. Galatians 5:16-21

  2. Galatians 5:22-23

  3. Empowerment for service: evangelism (acts 2:4, 5:14) praise, worship, thanksgiving and submissiveness (Eph 5:19-21)

Dr. Louis Sperry Chafer gives the following suggestions:

  1. Set aside a time to examine your life for sin and deal with it through I John 1:9, remembering that it’s not mechanical, but a father/child relationship.

  2. Worn nerves, physical weakness and depression do not indicate a lack of spirituality.  You may need to sleep more than to pray or you may need recreation more than introspection.

  3. Our entrance into God’s perfect provisions will always be imperfect.  That’s why we should shy away from using such terms as “absolute surrender, absolute dedication or absolute consecration.”

  4. The Christian life is sleeping and praying, resting and serving, playing and studying.  One is neither more not less spiritual in any of the activities of life.

THE UNITY OF THE BODY

Irony is a sophisticated technique, but it has a special appeal when it occurs in real life.  Irony occurs when a person’s words have a deeper meaning, which the speaker doesn’t realize at the time.  A case in point: when France surrendered to Germany and the French ministers and civil servants were leaving Paris to go to the new capital, there were two American films playing in Paris.  One was “Going Places,” and the other was “You Can’t Take It With You.”

John is fond of dramatic irony.  One of the ironies he included in his gospel account is in chapter 11, verses 49-50, when the Lazarus effect swings into motion.  The religious leader, Caiaphas, is giving advice to the other religious leaders who are upset because Jesus has raised Lazarus from the dead and people all over Jerusalem were in an uproar over Him.

Caiaphas said, “It would be better for one man (meaning Jesus) to die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”  He was saying that it would be better to put this “insurrectionist” down so that the Romans wouldn’t have to come and deal with the unrest fomenting in the nation.  But his words are ironic because Jesus will die as a substitute for His people, but not in the way Caiaphas thinks.

We read another irony in 10:16 where Jesus says that when He lays down His life, that it will be the basis of making Jewish and Gentile believers one.  These were trigger words to the religious leaders, who didn’t realize that the very death they were plotting would be the very means of making this new community.

Community.  People are hungry for it.  God created a community and community is important to Him.  Even before His creation of this new community, it was important to Him that there be community among His people.  Community was so important that He devotes a psalm to it (133).  In Genesis, we see that Joseph understood the importance of community in his day, long before the day of Ps. 133, and that explains why he put his brothers through certain tests—he wanted to see if they had learned “community” since they broke it when they had sold him into slavery.

What is this “community” that’s so important to God?  It’s not holding hands and singing “Cum Ba Ya.”  Community has stronger bones than that warm fuzzy.  Community is like a beard—can’t define it, but we know one when we see one.  People saw community in 1980 when the U.S. Olympic Hockey team beat Russia for the gold medal.  That team had it and you could see it.

The most famous feud in American History serves well here to help us define it.  The Hatfield’s and the McCoy’s are infamous because of their family feud.  Their community was so strong that if you attacked one Hatfield, you attacked all Hatfield’s.  Hurt one Hatfield and all Hatfield’s come at you because they’re blood “kee-un.”  The Hatfield’s are united in another way—they all shared one goal—kill all McCoy’s, every last one of them.

What did the Hatfield’s do for a living?  Most likely some were farmers, some were merchants, maybe one drove a stagecoach and another was a miller. The fact that they were from different occupations, made no difference.  They were Hatfield’s, so, no matter their various occupations, they had a community based on blood and a common goal.

Does this mean that the Hatfield’s always agreed? No.  Some were backward and liked turnip greens, while those who didn’t have the palate of a collie enjoyed more sophisticated food.  Maybe some Hatfield’s advocated that all McCoy’s be shot, while others argued that all McCoy’s should die a slow death by torture.  They might disagree over the method, but not the goal.  If a McCoy attacked the Hatfield who argued for bullets, it was the Hatfield who argued for torture that came to his rescue.

It’s amazing the community God has made.  In Ephesians 2:15-16, God calls this community the “new man.”  What God has done in the church is to take the Hatfield’s and the McCoy’s, put them together and make a community out of them.  Jews had such an aversion to Gentiles that they felt dirty if they went into their houses or bumped into them on the street.  Behind their backs they called them animals. (Gal. 3:28-29)

What kind of community is the church’s community?  Like the Hatfield’s, it’s based on blood and goal.  The believer is born into a family, God’s family (Jn. 1:12-13) and we’re all placed into the body of Christ at conversion (I Cor. 12:13).

Then we share a common goal based on issues.  Our goal is to make disciples (Matt. 28) as we glorify God together (I Cor. 10:31).  Now we have the strong bones of our community—organic and issue-driven.

This community is so important to God that He gave us pictures to help us understand it:  vine/branches; bride/groom; head/body.  I Cor. 12:13; Rom. 12:5; I Cor. 12:25-27; John 15.

Does this mean that the community will always agree?  Yes and no.  The community will always agree on the doctrines we’re looking at—deity of Christ, substitutionary atonement, inspiration of Scripture, etc.  But the community won’t agree on sprinkling or immersion; King James Version or NIV; red or blue carpet in the nursery.  Nonetheless, the organic and issue-driven community stands strong.

THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST

INTRODUCTION

Let’s examine four questions that, when answered, will help us to understand the Second Coming of Jesus Christ:

1.  How do we know Christ will return?

2.  How will Christ return?

3.  When will Christ return?

4.  What does the Second Coming mean to us?

5.  Why will He return?  

1.      How do we know Christ will return?  

          The first and foremost reason we know Christ will return to the earth   is because He said He would. (Matt. 24:27-30; Mark 13:24-26; Luke 21:25-27)  These statements settle the matter.  When Jesus speaks, that’s it.  But there are other statements.

          The angels said He would return. (Acts 1:11)

          The Old Testament prophets predict His Second Coming. (Zech. 14:4-9; Dan. 2:34-35, et. al.)

          The apostles said He would return. (Rev. 1:7 & 19:11, et. al.)

2.      How will Christ return?

          The short answer to this question is, “Differently than He came the first time.”  The first time He came, He came just as Isaiah 61:1-2a had predicted.  He came offering Himself as the King of Israel.  He allowed Israel to choose for or against His right to rule.  He came predicting and experiencing His rejection (Mark 10:32-34).  Paul summarizes the way He came the first time in Philippians 2:5-9.

          When He comes back, He will come suddenly, physically, with power and glory.  This was not the modus operandi of the first coming.

          Rev. 19:11-16 portrays the “how” of the Second Coming. (Note that at His first coming, the Roman officials put up a hastily lettered sign announcing Jesus as “The King of the Jews.”  In Revelation 19, He returns as “King of Kings and Lord of Lords.”)  Zechariah predicts that when He returns, it will be to the Mt. of Olives, and His feet will split the mountain, a phenomenon that didn’t occur at His first coming. Mark calls the “how” of His coming as being “with power and glory.”           (Mark 13:26)  A picture in miniature of His Second Coming is given in Matthew 17:1-2—the Transfiguration.

3.      When will He return?

          We don’t know when, but God does and has set the date.  (Matt. 24:36, Acts 1:6-7)  Those who set  dates for Christ’s coming end up having “miscalculated”, as well as embarrassed.  No date or dates should be set.

4.      What does His coming mean to us?

          The Second Coming means that the books will be balanced, that is, that we live in a moral universe (Acts 17:31; Rev. 20:11-15).  There are several judgments connected with His Second Coming, and a few of these will take place after His 1,000-year reign on earth (Rev. 20). It is important to know that He will put down evil and Satan forever (Rev. 20:10).

          Without the Second Coming, there is no hope for this howling wilderness. The world isn’t getting any better, and, without the Second Advent, there is only pessimism.  But the Bible paints a very optimistic picture for the future.  There is one Scripture that shows the precision of all of this:  Isaiah 61:1-2 as compared to Jesus’ sermon in Luke 4:16-20, where He carefully keeps separate His first and second comings.  He stops His quotation of Isaiah 61:1-2 and doesn’t complete it.  The reason is that, at His first coming, He comes to proclaim freedom to the captives, so He stops the quote at that point.  The last part of verse 2 has to do with His Second Coming only, so He doesn’t quote that part.

5.      Why will He return?

The fact of His judgments, in connection with His Second Coming, and, with the conclusion of His reign, give a literal meaning to the prophets and the psalms who see God enthroned over the earth as King and Judge.  (Ps. 9:8; 72:2 and 62:2)

His return means a fulfillment to the Abrahamic, Davidic, Palestinian and New Covenants promised in the Old Testament.  Israel will then receive all of their land God promised to them, as well as a “new heart” promised in the New Covenant.

The Second Coming fulfills passages such as Psalm 2.  His coming in triumph will be to an earth that last saw His seeming “defeat.”  His Coming will enable man to fulfill his destiny of having dominion over the earth under God, as stated as the original purpose of man’s creation in Genesis 1:26-28.  (It is amazing how all the Bible fits together in one unified and consistent whole.)

 

CONCLUSION

Jesus will return.  In power.  In glory.  Physically.  Literally.  The plan of God is neither a tragedy nor a catastrophe.  It is a triumph.

THE TRINITY

INTRODUCTION

What are some things you’re interested in?  Don’t you find it true that when you really get interested in a subject, you begin to investigate all about it?  Let’s say you become interested in some event in history and would like to know more about it.  Take the Battle of the Alamo, for example.  You read the book, “Thirteen Days to Glory” by Walter Lord.  You read the biographies of David Crockett, Jim Bowie and William Barrett Travis.  You’re really fascinated by the subject, so you read a doctoral dissertation on the subject which you get on interlibrary loan from the University of Texas, which is the definitive work on the subject.  Then you go to San Antonio and walk through the Alamo and soak up its history.  You go across the street and buy a few more books on the subject from the History Bookstore.

It’s then that you begin to discover something—you’re reading the same things that you read in other books, only from a different author.  You find that you’re somewhat of an expert on the subject.  Things start to repeat themselves.

What’s happening is that the mystery is gone!  It’s like hearing the same story twice.  When you first started your investigation, everything was new and exciting.  There was an intrigue about it, something of a mystery.  But now, it’s lost its mystery.

Yet there’s an area that’s different and always has an inscrutable mystery about it.  The Bible.  When you read the Bible, you find that you can’t exhaust it.  You find that you can’t master it, it masters you.  The Bible always has a tone of mystery about it, a sense of, “This is a mystery, now live within the light of it.”

That’s not to say that we can’t know or learn a great deal of the Bible, after all, it is revelation.  But there is a tone of mystery about many of the facts it reveals.  For example, we read of the substitutionary atonement where God (not we) laid our sins on Christ when He was on the cross.  That’s a  revelation of what was transpiring for those three hours.  But there’s a mystery to it—exactly how did God do this.  Take the virgin birth.  That’s another mystery.  It’s a fact, but a mystery.  Also, the act of inspiring the authors of Scripture so that what they wrote was what God wanted them to write—that’s a fact and a mystery.  The point is, what remains mysterious, remains interesting.

We come now to the great mystery—the greatest of them all.  It’s a mystery that, if it isn’t there, the whole of Christianity falls apart.  It’s the mystery of the Trinity.

Moving to a definition, we find that B.B. Warfield defined the Trinity as:  “There is one and only one God, but in the unity of the Godhead there are three co-eternal and co-equal Persons, the same in substance, but distinct in subsistence (necessary existence.)”

Scripture teaches the mystery of the Trinity by saying that the Father is God (Jn. 6:27 and I Peter 1:2); by saying that Jesus is God (Matt. 9:4, 28:18; Mark 2:1-12; Jn. 12:9; Col. 1:17; Jn. 1:3; Jn. 5:27) and by saying the Holy Spirit is God (Acts 5:3-4; I Cor. 2:10, 6:19; Jn. 3:5-6, 8).

Perhaps the following common illustrations of the Trinity might prove helpful:

  1. Water is three in one.  It can be a solid, a gas and a liquid.  There is a “triple point” for water, a condition where ice, steam and liquid can co-exist in equilibrium.

  2. The sun is something no one has seen, just as no one has seen the Father.  Yet we learn about the sun by studying its light, just as we learn about the Father by studying His Son, who is the radiance of His glory (Heb. 1:3).  We see the power of the sun when we see seeds grow.  What makes them grow?  The answer is “the sun.”  The Holy Spirit is the One who enables spiritual growth.

Yet, still the Trinity is a fascinating mystery.  Yet, it is a mystery we must have or Christianity falls apart.

  1. If there is no Trinity, then we have the impossible—a needy God.       Without the Trinity, God needs love and companionship, which makes Him need us.   But  the  doctrine of  the Trinity solves that problem.  In Titus 1:2, we learn of communication among the members of the Trinity before the world began. In John 17:24, we learn of love among the members of the Trinity before the world began.  God didn’t need someone to love and someone with whom to communicate.

  2. If there is no Trinity, then we have no Savior—those who reject the Trinity, reject the deity of Christ.  If Jesus isn’t God, then He’s not perfect and He’s not God’s great gift to us.  If Jesus isn’t God, then   He’s imperfect, and therefore, can’t be the perfect sacrifice for our sins.  God won’t forgive, as an act of generosity, because that would compromise His own holiness.  Zechariah 12:10 says that it was God who was pierced (“Me” in God) and that could only be a prediction of Jesus who was the One who was pierced.  It was God’s blood which purchased the church (Acts 20:28, which could only be a reference to Jesus, because He was the One who bled.  Paul says that they “crucified the Lord of Glory,” which ascribes deity to Jesus.  (I Cor. 2:28)  The whole plan of salvation depends on the deity of Christ.

  3. If there is no Trinity, the Bible falls apart—because the Bible says that Jesus is God and that the Holy Spirit is God.  If they are not, then the Bible has misled us.

  4. If there is no Trinity, there is no regeneration—because when a person believes in Jesus as Savior, the Holy Spirit regenerates him - a work only God can do.

CONCLUSION

The Trinity is a mystery beyond all earthly logic.  It is otherworldly.  What we can see and hear and understand doesn’t remain a mystery to us.  That can never be the case with the Trinity.  The Trinity shows us a world we’re hungry for, not the world we live in.    

For more information about our church or comments on this web site, please contact webmaster@countylinechurch.com.

Copyright © 2010, County Line Congregational Christian Church